OK, isso encerra tudo.
Ok, deixe o competente Jim Ridley assumir o meu lugar:
"
Snakes on a Plane goes about its give-the-people-what-they-want mission with a
crassness so single-minded it's positively gleeful. There's something almost refreshingly venal about a movie with no purpose other than to meet intentions this
cheesy.
(...)
"A filmmaker with a sense of embarrassment might try to downplay the
obviousness of these stock characters and their Fisher-Price exposition. Not so director David R. Ellis, a veteran second-unit man who showed mad genre-movie skillz with
Final Destination 2 and
Cellular. Ellis
emphasizes their phoniness to the point of
absurdity...
(...)
"The en-masse snake attacks are staged with splattery verve and sick humor: If
Mad TV had the balls-out tastelessness to parody
United 93, it might resemble the montage of passengers taking up arms against their slithery foes.
(...)
"Seen with a big, unruly audience
laughing in disbelief at its own willingness to get on board, the movie is a lot of fun--a communal midnight-movie experience in prime time."
Sim, esses são os critérios comumente associados com qualidade. Como eu não percebi?
Snakes on a Plane.
Snakes on a Plane.
Snakes on a Plane.