-
Caro Visitante, por que não gastar alguns segundos e criar uma Conta no Fórum Valinor? Desta forma, além de não ver este aviso novamente, poderá participar de nossa comunidade, inserir suas opiniões e sugestões, fazendo parte deste que é um maiores Fóruns de Discussão do Brasil! Aproveite e cadastre-se já!
Críticas do Retorno do Rei
- Criador do tópico Manigolas
- Data de Criação
- Status
Eu juro que não entendo isso. As coisas precisam ser necessariamente preto ou branco, ruim ou bom, céu ou inferno?
Qual o problema em achar que o PJ pode fazer alterações que melhorem o fluxo da história no cinema? Puxa, isso é o trabalho dele. Se fossem alterações literárias, se a equipe de roteiristas quisesse fazer uma versão resumida do livro, acho que os comentários negativos seriam bem aplicados.
Eu, do alto da minha posição de fã apaixonado por Tolkien, prefiro algumas passagens do filme. Rezem por minha alma.
Qual o problema em achar que o PJ pode fazer alterações que melhorem o fluxo da história no cinema? Puxa, isso é o trabalho dele. Se fossem alterações literárias, se a equipe de roteiristas quisesse fazer uma versão resumida do livro, acho que os comentários negativos seriam bem aplicados.
Eu, do alto da minha posição de fã apaixonado por Tolkien, prefiro algumas passagens do filme. Rezem por minha alma.
Gildor disse:Eu juro que não entendo isso. As coisas precisam ser necessariamente preto ou branco, ruim ou bom, céu ou inferno?
Qual o problema em achar que o PJ pode fazer alterações que melhorem o fluxo da história no cinema? Puxa, isso é o trabalho dele. Se fossem alterações literárias, se a equipe de roteiristas quisesse fazer uma versão resumida do livro, acho que os comentários negativos seriam bem aplicados.
Eu, do alto da minha posição de fã apaixonado por Tolkien, prefiro algumas passagens do filme. Rezem por minha alma.
Calma, Gildor...
Aí eu começo a concordar com você... Uma coisa é fazer uma mudança que altere o fluxo da história. Isto, além de ser natural, é válido, e eu também prefiro... Mas outra coisa é preferir mudar a história, como alguns vem sugerindo aqui...
De qualquer forma, vou orar por sua alma... E pela minha também, hehe...
Ele teve que falar com certa isenção e tal... aposto que ele se empolgou 
Pois bem Láthspell... Aponte aqui os pontos que alguns que você disse aqui que vem sugerindo a mudança da história... Já vi as 5 páginas e ainda não encontrei isso... Só um detalhe, alteração e adaptação FAZEM parte do cinema... Como tem gente que fica nessa alucinação de comparação... QUE COISA INFANTILÓIDE E CHATA!
NightRaven
Banned
Não entendi!
“A Decent Ending to An Epic Trilogy” título diz isso e nota isso: B ele achou melhor Duas Torres...
The third and final installment of The Lord of the Rings, The Return of the King has finally arrived. Director Peter Jackson's big screen rendering of J.R.R. Tolkien's epic trilogy is sure to please its fans but is not as consistent in quality as its predecessor The Two Towers.
From The Fellowship of the Ring and The Two Towers, we know that hobbit Frodo (Elijah Wood), along with a fellowship of elves, humans, wizards and other hobbits, must destroy a magical ring that, if fallen into the wrong hands, will allow the evil Sauron to destroy Middle-earth. Return of the King tells the final leg of their quest to quell evil's dominance and to restore mankind as rulers of the Middle-earth.
Frodo and his friend Sam (Sean Astin) are led by Gollum (Andy Serkis), a grotesque schizophrenic creature, to Mount Doom, where Frodo must destroy the ring by throwing it into the fiery mountain. Guarded by orcs and other evil forces, the quest seems impossible. Meanwhile, the remainder of the fellowship helps to defend Minas Tirith where humanity must make its last stand against the evil that seeks to destroy them.
The cast is one of Return of the King's strongest asset. Each actor portrays his character's unique traits with depth and, despite a few hokey lines throughout the script, you feel like you know these characters well.
Human Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen), elf Legolas (Orlando Bloom) and dwarf Gimli (John Rhys-Davies) generate much of the excitement during the epic battle sequences. Through scene after scene of fighting and defeat, these characters, along with the beautiful and courageous Eowyn (Miranda Otto), communicate confidence, strength and honor even in the face of impossible odds.
In Frodo and Sam's struggle through Mordor to destroy the ring, director Jackson reveals the emotional and intimate side of the epic story. Astin delivers the movie's best performance as he grows from a helping friend into a hero who will do what is right at any cost. Wood is outstanding as well, and when their quest is finally over you feel a strong sense of brotherhood between them -- a tragic kind that soldiers who have fought the most horrific kinds of battles might feel for one another.
Unfortunately, some of the battles are anti-climactic because they are won by accident or by pulling a victory "out of a hat." For example, in one scene the wizard Gandalf (Ian McKellen) summons some giant eagles to help defend his army against attack. But why didn't he do this before when it would have been a prudent defense in similar attacks? We had no way of knowing he had this power, so his use of it in this particular circumstance seems arbitrary. Perhaps these kinds of powers are meant to awe us into admiring the magical powers for their own sake, but instead they undercut the dramatic tension because they create the sense that you're at the mercy of the writer's whim and not the ability of the characters to defeat their enemies.
When Return of the King feels like it has ended, don't leave the theater too quickly. There's a parade of seemingly final scenes. And just when you really think the last scene has been shown, a voiceover says "but there is still more to be written…" This may be true to the book, but it doesn't quite work for the movie.
Still, The Return of the King, like its predecessors, will please even those with only a mild interest in fantasy, because at its root it's about good versus evil and the triumph of mankind to rule the earth.
Em negrito: é aquele velho problema, as águias! pq num ajudaram antes? é isso ou eu num sei ler inglês?
“A Decent Ending to An Epic Trilogy” título diz isso e nota isso: B ele achou melhor Duas Torres...
The third and final installment of The Lord of the Rings, The Return of the King has finally arrived. Director Peter Jackson's big screen rendering of J.R.R. Tolkien's epic trilogy is sure to please its fans but is not as consistent in quality as its predecessor The Two Towers.
From The Fellowship of the Ring and The Two Towers, we know that hobbit Frodo (Elijah Wood), along with a fellowship of elves, humans, wizards and other hobbits, must destroy a magical ring that, if fallen into the wrong hands, will allow the evil Sauron to destroy Middle-earth. Return of the King tells the final leg of their quest to quell evil's dominance and to restore mankind as rulers of the Middle-earth.
Frodo and his friend Sam (Sean Astin) are led by Gollum (Andy Serkis), a grotesque schizophrenic creature, to Mount Doom, where Frodo must destroy the ring by throwing it into the fiery mountain. Guarded by orcs and other evil forces, the quest seems impossible. Meanwhile, the remainder of the fellowship helps to defend Minas Tirith where humanity must make its last stand against the evil that seeks to destroy them.
The cast is one of Return of the King's strongest asset. Each actor portrays his character's unique traits with depth and, despite a few hokey lines throughout the script, you feel like you know these characters well.
Human Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen), elf Legolas (Orlando Bloom) and dwarf Gimli (John Rhys-Davies) generate much of the excitement during the epic battle sequences. Through scene after scene of fighting and defeat, these characters, along with the beautiful and courageous Eowyn (Miranda Otto), communicate confidence, strength and honor even in the face of impossible odds.
In Frodo and Sam's struggle through Mordor to destroy the ring, director Jackson reveals the emotional and intimate side of the epic story. Astin delivers the movie's best performance as he grows from a helping friend into a hero who will do what is right at any cost. Wood is outstanding as well, and when their quest is finally over you feel a strong sense of brotherhood between them -- a tragic kind that soldiers who have fought the most horrific kinds of battles might feel for one another.
Unfortunately, some of the battles are anti-climactic because they are won by accident or by pulling a victory "out of a hat." For example, in one scene the wizard Gandalf (Ian McKellen) summons some giant eagles to help defend his army against attack. But why didn't he do this before when it would have been a prudent defense in similar attacks? We had no way of knowing he had this power, so his use of it in this particular circumstance seems arbitrary. Perhaps these kinds of powers are meant to awe us into admiring the magical powers for their own sake, but instead they undercut the dramatic tension because they create the sense that you're at the mercy of the writer's whim and not the ability of the characters to defeat their enemies.
When Return of the King feels like it has ended, don't leave the theater too quickly. There's a parade of seemingly final scenes. And just when you really think the last scene has been shown, a voiceover says "but there is still more to be written…" This may be true to the book, but it doesn't quite work for the movie.
Still, The Return of the King, like its predecessors, will please even those with only a mild interest in fantasy, because at its root it's about good versus evil and the triumph of mankind to rule the earth.
Em negrito: é aquele velho problema, as águias! pq num ajudaram antes? é isso ou eu num sei ler inglês?
Elendil Senhor de Andúnië
Usuário
NOOOOSSSSSA!!!!!!!!!!
No site RottenTomatoes há 32 reviews do "Retorno do Rei",e a média é(pasmen) de 9,6 !!!!!!!!!! Nunca vi tantos reviews tão bem argumentados quanto estes 32:
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/TheLordoftheRingsTheReturnoftheKing-1127213/reviews.php
No site RottenTomatoes há 32 reviews do "Retorno do Rei",e a média é(pasmen) de 9,6
!!!!!!!!!! Nunca vi tantos reviews tão bem argumentados quanto estes 32:http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/TheLordoftheRingsTheReturnoftheKing-1127213/reviews.php
Critica ruim, 6 de 10:
http://www.joblo.com/returnoftheking.htm
"The film's 3-4 different endings were also ridiculously out of line."
Visito sempre esse site. . .
Ele não gosta desses tipos de filme. . .
http://www.joblo.com/returnoftheking.htm
"The film's 3-4 different endings were also ridiculously out of line."
Visito sempre esse site. . .
Ele não gosta desses tipos de filme. . .
SyncMaster
Usuário
Neste momento, o site www.rottentomatoes.com tem 62 criticas com uma média de 9,6 (100 porcento)....
"An experience of epic scope and grandeur, amazing emotional power, and relentless momentum."
"An experience of epic scope and grandeur, amazing emotional power, and relentless momentum."
Sim! Falaram bem do filme! Mas não sei porque comecei a rir ao terminar de ler...
http://www.heroi.com.br/filmes/ler.asp?id=59930
Três palavras: Newsweek, Veja e Rubens E. Filho. . .
MEU DEUS!!!
http://www.heroi.com.br/filmes/ler.asp?id=59930
Três palavras: Newsweek, Veja e Rubens E. Filho. . .
MEU DEUS!!!
Elendil Senhor de Andúnië
Usuário
Só digo algumas coisinhas:62 reviews do "RdR" com média de 9,6 não é pra qualquer filme não.Aliás,nenhum filme na história teve uma média tão alta,isso significa que "Retorno do Rei" já pode ser considerado um dos maiores filmes da história!
NightRaven
Banned
É fato já....o filme é tudo q deve ser, as únicas criticas q forem ruins podem ter certeza q é mal vontade com o gênero ou que não aguenta escutar mais sobre SDA!
PS: O critico do www.adorocinema.com.br não fez a critica do As Duas Torres, será q vai fazer do RDR? tomara q fique longe!
PS: O critico do www.adorocinema.com.br não fez a critica do As Duas Torres, será q vai fazer do RDR? tomara q fique longe!
Aragorn- King of Gondor
Usuário
Críticas AMERICANAS de O senhor dos Anéis: O Retorno do rei.....tirado do site www.movies.go.com.....se quiserem ler os textos compretos de todos os principais jornais e revistas gringos, visitem eo site e acessem em "more".
BBC Films 5 stars/5 ? about as awesome as cinema gets. more Boston Globe 3½ stars/4 ? may leave one overwhelmed and exhausted. more
Chicago Tribune 4 stars/4 ? a movie that, purely and simply, has visions and excitement to blow us away once again. more
Entertainment Weekly A ? passionate and literate, detailed and expansive ?
Film Journal International N/A ? contains some of the most eye-popping images you're likely to see this year, if not this decade. more
Hollywood Reporter N/A ? a breathtaking argument for director Peter Jackson winning every award there is to give ? more
New York Post 4 stars/4 ? stirs the heart, mind and soul as few films ever have. more
New York Times N/A ? a meticulous and prodigious vision made by a director who was not hamstrung by heavy use of computer special-effects imagery. more
Reel Views 4 stars/4 ? not only the best movie of 2003, but the crowning cinematic achievement of the past several years. more
San Francisco Chronicle N/A ? an estimable success overall ? more
Slant Magazine 3½ stars/4 ? a ravishing work of mythic restoration. more
TV Guide 3½ stars/5 ? like its predecessors, a spectacle of the first order. more
USA Today 4 stars/4 ? the jewel in the crown of the masterful trilogy. more
Variety N/A ? an urgently paced 200-minute film without an ounce of fat ?
Village Voice N/A ? certainly the greatest feat of pop movie magic since Titanic ? more
SIM, não tem NENHUMA crítica sequer mediana...é tudo POSITIVA!!!!
e segundo o site, tem tudo pra Ganhar o oscar!
BBC Films 5 stars/5 ? about as awesome as cinema gets. more Boston Globe 3½ stars/4 ? may leave one overwhelmed and exhausted. more
Chicago Tribune 4 stars/4 ? a movie that, purely and simply, has visions and excitement to blow us away once again. more
Entertainment Weekly A ? passionate and literate, detailed and expansive ?
Film Journal International N/A ? contains some of the most eye-popping images you're likely to see this year, if not this decade. more
Hollywood Reporter N/A ? a breathtaking argument for director Peter Jackson winning every award there is to give ? more
New York Post 4 stars/4 ? stirs the heart, mind and soul as few films ever have. more
New York Times N/A ? a meticulous and prodigious vision made by a director who was not hamstrung by heavy use of computer special-effects imagery. more
Reel Views 4 stars/4 ? not only the best movie of 2003, but the crowning cinematic achievement of the past several years. more
San Francisco Chronicle N/A ? an estimable success overall ? more
Slant Magazine 3½ stars/4 ? a ravishing work of mythic restoration. more
TV Guide 3½ stars/5 ? like its predecessors, a spectacle of the first order. more
USA Today 4 stars/4 ? the jewel in the crown of the masterful trilogy. more
Variety N/A ? an urgently paced 200-minute film without an ounce of fat ?
Village Voice N/A ? certainly the greatest feat of pop movie magic since Titanic ? more
SIM, não tem NENHUMA crítica sequer mediana...é tudo POSITIVA!!!!
e segundo o site, tem tudo pra Ganhar o oscar!
- Status
Tópicos similares
